This policy explains how TechJaadu decides what to publish, how our guides are researched, written, checked, and updated, and how we keep our editorial work separate from advertising and affiliate income. It is meant to help you judge how much confidence to place in what you read here.
For who we are and who we write for, see About TechJaadu. For the limits of our content, see our Disclaimer.
1. Editorial Purpose
TechJaadu exists to help small-business owners, creators, freelancers, and social-media managers solve practical problems with WhatsApp Business, Instagram, and connected publishing tools. Every article should help a reader understand a problem and decide what to do next.
Our approach follows the same principle that search engines say they reward: content created primarily to help people, not to attract clicks. Google describes this in its guidance on creating helpful, reliable, people-first content.
2. Core Editorial Standards
Every guide is held to these standards:
- Accuracy: Claims are based on evidence, not assumption, and uncertain points are labeled as uncertain.
- Usefulness: A guide must solve or clearly explain a real problem, not pad a topic with filler.
- Clarity: We use plain language, define unfamiliar terms, and place the answer near the top.
- Specificity: We state the app, device, account type, and conditions a step applies to.
- Honesty: We do not exaggerate results, invent causes, or imply capabilities we lack.
- Reader safety: We warn about steps that could affect data, accounts, or access before the step, not after.
- Originality: We write our own explanations and do not copy or closely rewrite other publishers’ articles.
3. Who Creates Our Content
TechJaadu articles are written, reviewed, and maintained by [the site operator / the TechJaadu editorial team]. [Add a short description of the team’s experience, for example: years of experience managing business messaging and social-media accounts, and the kinds of accounts and devices used for testing.]
Where an article has a named author, the author’s name appears on the page. Where an article is reviewed by someone else, we say so. We do not publish content under false names or invented credentials.
4. How We Choose Topics
We choose topics based on real problems that business owners and creators face. Ideas come from:
- Questions and problem reports sent to us by readers.
- Changes we notice in the apps or in official announcements.
- Recurring issues in official help forums and community discussions.
- Gaps we find in existing explanations, such as missing context or confusing steps.
We do not choose topics solely because they are popular search terms. If we cannot give a helpful, accurate answer to a question, we would rather not publish an article on it.
We do not publish content that encourages evading platform rules, spamming, mass unsolicited messaging, fake engagement, or accessing accounts without authorization.
5. Research and Sources
When we research an article, we give priority to sources in this order:
- Official documentation: the help centers, business help pages, and in-app text provided by WhatsApp, Instagram, and Meta.
- Our own hands-on checks: what we observe directly in the app (see the next section).
- Reliable secondary sources: well-regarded technical publications, platform announcements, and developer documentation.
- Reader reports and community discussions: used only to identify problems and possible causes, never as proof on their own.
When sources disagree, we say so rather than choose silently. Where official documentation is thin or out of date, we tell the reader what is confirmed and what is not. We link to the sources a reader needs to check important claims.
6. Hands-On Testing
Where practical, we check instructions in the app itself before publishing. When we have tested a step, we state the app, device type, and approximate date of the test. We do not claim hands-on testing for steps we did not actually perform.
Some issues cannot be tested, including those that depend on regional rollouts, account history, or platform decisions. In those cases, the article is based on documentation and research and says that it is. When a problem cannot be reproduced, we say that too.
7. Writing and Structure
Our guides follow a consistent structure so readers can find what they need quickly:
- A short direct answer or summary near the start.
- The situation the guide applies to, including the app, device, and account type.
- Numbered steps, with the reason for each important step.
- Warnings placed before any step that could affect data or access.
- What to do next if the steps do not work, including when to contact the platform.
We use American English, short sentences, and descriptive headings. We avoid clickbait titles, misleading promises, and padding added only to lengthen a page.
8. Safety Review
Before publishing, we check each guide for steps that could cause harm. Anything involving backups, app data, device changes, account connections, or login recovery receives a closer review. We:
- Explain the consequences of a step before recommending it.
- Recommend backing up data where loss is possible.
- Tell readers to use only official app stores and official websites.
- Never ask readers to share passwords, verification codes, or recovery information.
9. Screenshots, Images, and Originality
We create our own screenshots, diagrams, and images where possible. Screenshots show the interface at the time they were taken, and we remove or hide personal information such as names, numbers, messages, and account details before publishing.
We do not copy text, images, or screenshots from other publishers without permission. When we quote a short excerpt, we credit and link to the source. If we use a licensed or third-party image, we follow its license terms and give credit where required.
10. Use of AI Tools
We may use AI-based tools to assist with tasks such as research, outlining, grammar checks, translation, or editing. AI tools do not replace human responsibility. Every article is reviewed by a person before publication, and we are responsible for what is published.
AI output is never treated as a source of truth. We verify technical claims, steps, and settings against official documentation or direct checks. We do not publish automatically generated content that has not been reviewed, and we do not use AI tools to invent testing, sources, quotes, reviews, or author credentials.
Using automation to generate large amounts of content mainly to manipulate search rankings goes against our standards and against search-engine spam policies.
11. Review and Fact-Checking
Before an article goes live, it goes through these checks:
- Accuracy check: facts, feature names, menu paths, and steps are compared with official documentation or our own testing.
- Relevance check: the article is confirmed to answer the question it promises to answer.
- Safety check: warnings and backup advice are added where needed.
- Language check: the text is reviewed for clarity, grammar, and consistency.
- Link check: links are confirmed to work and to point to relevant, reliable pages.
12. Updates and Dates
Apps change, so our content is not “publish and forget.” We review articles when:
- An app update changes a menu, setting, or feature the article describes.
- A reader reports an outdated step or error.
- Official documentation changes in a way that affects the article.
- An article is found to be underperforming in usefulness, for example because it leaves common questions unanswered.
Articles show a published date and, where there has been a meaningful revision, an updated date. We change the updated date only when the content has substantively changed, not for minor edits such as fixing a typo. Where a feature has been removed or replaced, we update the article, or add a clear notice, or retire the page.
13. Corrections
We correct errors promptly once we confirm them. How we handle them depends on their significance:
- Minor errors (typos, formatting, broken links) are fixed quietly.
- Substantive errors (incorrect steps, wrong claims, or advice that could cause harm) are corrected, and where appropriate we add a short note describing what was changed.
- Serious errors that could lead to data loss or account risk are corrected as a priority.
We do not remove criticism or quietly rewrite history in ways that mislead readers about what the article said earlier.
14. Editorial Independence and Monetization
TechJaadu is supported by advertising and, in some articles, affiliate links. Our editorial decisions are separate from those revenue sources:
- Advertisers do not influence what we write, how we write it, or which products we mention.
- Affiliate commissions do not determine our recommendations. We mention a product because it may help readers, and affiliate links are disclosed.
- We do not accept payment in exchange for favorable coverage. If we ever publish sponsored or paid content, we will label it clearly and keep it separate from our editorial guides.
- We do not place advertising in ways intended to mislead readers into clicking, and we follow the Google AdSense Program policies.
Details about how information is collected for advertising are in our Privacy Policy.
15. Conflicts of Interest
If we have a financial, personal, or professional relationship that could reasonably influence an article, such as an affiliate relationship, a free product, or a business connection, we disclose it in that article. If we cannot cover a topic fairly because of a conflict, we do not publish it.
16. Reader Feedback and Requests
Readers help us improve. You can tell us about an outdated instruction, a factual error, an unclear explanation, or a topic you would like us to cover. Use our Contact Us page and include the article link and relevant details.
We read and review the messages we receive and aim to act on meaningful reports, but we cannot promise a reply or a timeline for every message. We do not provide individual account recovery or troubleshooting. Please never send passwords or verification codes.
17. Reviewing This Policy
We review this Editorial Policy periodically and update it when our practices change. The “Last updated” date at the top shows the latest revision.